Re: [PATCH 2/2]: sparc64: Add ftrace support.

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed May 14 2008 - 17:58:46 EST


David Miller wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:32:18 -0400

If you add the following in arch/sparc64/kernel/Makefile

ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
obj-y += ftrace.o
# Do not trace the ftrace code itself
ORIG_CFLAGS := $(KBUILD_CFLAGS)
KBUILD_CFLAGS = $(if $(filter-out ftrace, $(basename $(notdir $@))), \
$(ORIG_CFLAGS), \
$(subst -pg,,$(ORIG_CFLAGS)))
endif

Then you wont need the "notrace" annotations on the functions.

That frankly looks like crap compared to the simple "notrace"
annotations in the *.c file.

This Makefile turd is in fact seemingly multiplying in various
places in the ftrace tree, please reverse this trend.

I wish it wasn't so ugly. The Makefile scripts allow you to add more CFLAGS to specific files but does not have a way to remove generic flags. If there was a better way then I would love to do it.

The problem is that adding "notrace" on ever function that needs it, also becomes quite messy. Especially when you have files where all functions in the file needs a notrace and there is 40 or so small functions that this applies to.

To add flags to file foo.c one simply needs to do

CFLAGS_foo.o = -newflags

It would be nice to have something like

CFLAGS_REMOVE_foo.o = -pg

Perhaps that is possible to do. Then the above "Makefile turd" wont be so crappy.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/