Re: [patch 2/4] PNP: replace pnp_resource_table with dynamicallyallocated resources

From: Rene Herman
Date: Mon May 19 2008 - 19:23:51 EST


On 16-05-08 00:07, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

PNP used to have a fixed-size pnp_resource_table for tracking the
resources used by a device. This table often overflowed, so we've
had to increase the table size, which wastes memory because most
devices have very few resources.

This patch replaces the table with a linked list of resources where
the entries are allocated on demand.

[ ... ]

static void pnp_clean_resource_table(struct pnp_dev *dev)
{
- struct resource *res;
- int idx;
+ struct pnp_resource *pnp_res, *tmp;
- for (idx = 0; idx < PNP_MAX_IRQ; idx++) {
- res = &dev->res->irq[idx].res;
- if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_AUTO) {
- res->flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ;
- pnp_init_resource(res);
- }
- }
- for (idx = 0; idx < PNP_MAX_DMA; idx++) {
- res = &dev->res->dma[idx].res;
- if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_AUTO) {
- res->flags = IORESOURCE_DMA;
- pnp_init_resource(res);
- }
- }
- for (idx = 0; idx < PNP_MAX_PORT; idx++) {
- res = &dev->res->port[idx].res;
- if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_AUTO) {
- res->flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
- pnp_init_resource(res);
- }
- }
- for (idx = 0; idx < PNP_MAX_MEM; idx++) {
- res = &dev->res->mem[idx].res;
- if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_AUTO) {
- res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
- pnp_init_resource(res);
- }
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(pnp_res, tmp, &dev->resources, list) {
+ if (pnp_res->res.flags & IORESOURCE_AUTO)
+ pnp_free_resource(pnp_res);
}
}


Do correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe this will do. The index for the resources is preserved simply due to the list position after the DISABLED thing but here the list is reshuffled.

So say I have an ISAPnP device with 2 port resources the second of which I force to manual setting through sysfs (ie, AUTO is cleared). This API would then delete the first port resource after which the second port resource is the first entry in the list which would make for example isapnp_set_resource() program it into hardware index 1, no?

This function would appear to be unimplementable now? It's called from pnp_assign_resources() and pnp_disable_dev().

(stopped review there, since it seems this needs to either change or you need to slap some sense into me first)

Rene.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/