Re: [PATCH] Fix to return wrong pointer in slob

[MinChan Kim]

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 22:12 +0900, MinChan Kim wrote:
>> Although slob_alloc return NULL, __kmalloc_node returns NULL + align.
>> Because align always can be changed, it is very hard for debugging
>> problem of no page if it don't return NULL.
>>
>> We have to return NULL in case of no page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  mm/slob.c |    9 ++++++---
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
>> index 6038cba..258d76d 100644
>> --- a/mm/slob.c
>> +++ b/mm/slob.c
>> @@ -469,9 +469,12 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node)
>>                       return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
>>
>>               m = slob_alloc(size + align, gfp, align, node);
>> -             if (m)
>> -                     *m = size;
>> -             return (void *)m + align;
>> +             if (!m)
>> +                     return NULL;
>> +             else {
>> +                     *m = size;
>> +                     return (void *)m + align;
>> +             }
>
> This looks good, but I would remove the 'else {' and '}' here. It's nice
> to have the 'normal path' minimally indented.

I agree
Thanks, Matt :)


-- 
Thanks,
MinChan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/