Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code

[Andreas Schwab]

Trent Piepho <tpiepho@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> For the LE versions, eventually they boil down to an asm that will look
> something like this:
> asm("sync; stwbrx %1,0,%2" : "=m" (*addr) : "r" (val), "r" (addr));
>
> While not perfect, this appears to be the best one can do.  The issue is
> that the "stwbrx" instruction only comes in an indexed, or 'x', version, in
> which the address is represented by the sum of two registers (the "0,%2").
> Unfortunately, gcc doesn't have a constraint for an indexed memory
> reference.

There is the "Z" constraint, which matches either an indirect or an
indexed memory address.  That should fit here.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/