Re: RTC subsystem and 11 min rtc update

From: Maciej W. Rozycki
Date: Wed May 21 2008 - 18:19:18 EST


On Wed, 21 May 2008, Philippe De Muyter wrote:

> Should update_persistent_clock not be directly part of the rtc subsystem,
> instead of falling in a detour or a dead-end in the arch subsystem ?

See the recent discussion around my proposal:

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.1/1772.html

I am about to update some of the architecture bits in arch/mips/sibyte,
but otherwise the patchset is ready to go. Feel free to join the
discussion and/or update your platform to make use of the generic
rtc_read_persistent_clock() and rtc_update_persistent_clock() functions.
Testing is always welcome too.

Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/