Re: Moving include/asm-* [was: Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?]

[Al Viro]

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:20:27PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 22 May 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> > 
> > Eh?  git mv include/asm-$i arch/$i/include/asm, then?
> 
> Yeah, sorry, I dropped an "include/" there. 
> 
> > Nice, but... how do you pull what's currently asm-generic/foo.h from what's
> > currently asm-bar/foo.h?  #include_next is _ugly_...
> 
> I was actually going to suggest #include_next, yes. But if people hate it, 
> we can certainly just keep the current <asm-generic/xyz.h> approach.

Another alternative is to replace asm-generic/ with generic/asm and have
-I include -I arch/$ARCH/include -I include/generic. Then we'd have

linux/foo.h => include/linux/foo.h (one lookup)
asm/foo.h => arch/include/asm/foo.h if it exists (negative on include/asm,
                                                  then one lookup)
          => include/generic/asm/foo.h otherwise (negative on include/asm,
                                                  negative lookup,
                                                  lookup)
generic/asm/foo.h => include/generic/asm/foo.h   (one lookup)

No #include_next at all.  Kludgy, though...  Note that arch/um will need
more interesting treatment in any case and so may things like arch/arm
with its include/asm/arch symlink ;-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/