Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standardindentation of arguments)

[david]

On Thu, 22 May 2008, Jesper Juhl wrote:

a couple minor corrections

> In some cases it's easy; if you are working on a very specific area
> like the real-time properties of the kernel, then the experimental -tr
> tree is probably what you want to develop against. In most cases

here you mean the -rt tree, not the -tr tree

> If your patch did not get applied and you recieved an ACK or some
> criticism about your patch, then your job is easy. If there's a very

here you mean NACK not ACK

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/