Re: initialization of static per-cpu variables

[Adrian Bunk]

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:20:06PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thursday 22 May 2008 04:28:02 Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I encountered this comment in kernel/softirq.c:
> >
> > /* Some compilers disobey section attribute on statics when not
> >    initialized -- RR */
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_head, tasklet_vec) = { NULL };
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_head, tasklet_hi_vec) = { NULL };
> >
> > So I assume it's the combination of static and whatever section
> > DFINE_PER_CPU puts the variable in which is the problem.
> >
> > However, there's a LOT of these "static DEFINE_PER_CPU" without any
> > initializer in the rest of the code, e.g.:
> 
> Yep, it was an old toolchain used by Sparc: DaveM found this one.  As you say, 
> it's ancient: I'm happy to queue a cleanup patch now everyone is on a modern 
> compiler.

The commit says:

    [PATCH] softirq.c per_cpu fix
    
    GCC3.1 apparently gets confused about uninitialized sections


We do still support gcc 3.2 (which is the same as 3.1 except for a C++ 
ABI change) as a compiler for the kernel.


> Thanks,
> Rusty.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/