Re: PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+
From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Sat May 24 2008 - 04:08:59 EST
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 01:46 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 19:18 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> > Should I still be trying Peter's se.waker patch as well in this mix
> > somewhere?
>
> Yeah.
btw, the problem with 2.6.25.4 and this load is one and the same. With
a 1:N load, you really don't want work generator waking all worker-bees
on it's CPU. The patchlet below let's you turn it off.
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 1e4596c..5641eb8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -596,6 +596,7 @@ enum {
SCHED_FEAT_START_DEBIT = 4,
SCHED_FEAT_HRTICK = 8,
SCHED_FEAT_DOUBLE_TICK = 16,
+ SCHED_FEAT_SYNC_WAKEUPS = 32,
};
const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_features =
@@ -603,7 +604,8 @@ const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_features =
SCHED_FEAT_WAKEUP_PREEMPT * 1 |
SCHED_FEAT_START_DEBIT * 1 |
SCHED_FEAT_HRTICK * 1 |
- SCHED_FEAT_DOUBLE_TICK * 0;
+ SCHED_FEAT_DOUBLE_TICK * 0 |
+ SCHED_FEAT_SYNC_WAKEUPS * 0;
#define sched_feat(x) (sysctl_sched_features & SCHED_FEAT_##x)
@@ -1902,6 +1904,9 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int sync)
long old_state;
struct rq *rq;
+ if (!sched_feat(SYNC_WAKEUPS))
+ sync = 0;
+
smp_wmb();
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
old_state = p->state;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/