Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage
From: Jared Hulbert
Date: Tue Jun 03 2008 - 21:14:53 EST
> the alternate technologies that I have heard about are either _far_ less
> dense then DRAM (similar to static ram) or require erasing in blocks
> (similar to flash).
I will agree with this.
> niether one is appropriate for a large, flat addressed
> memory architecture as you list below.
I don't agree with this one. Erase blocks don't automatically
disqualify a memory as a fit into a flat addressed arch. You need to
play games at the memory management layer to make it work, but it's
not impossible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/