Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Replace xxx_pda() operations with x86_xx_percpu().

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Paravirt support is on. We have seen an issue with that in the past. Why 
> was that again?
>   

I'm not aware of any paravirt-related percpu bugs (other than the fact 
that the last major revision of per-cpu variables was done under the 
aegis of paravirt-ops).

But booting on bare hardware with pvops enabled should be exactly the 
same as non-pvops with respect to percpu.

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/