On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:47:27 +0200
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:No, it doesn't work. The problem seems to be in the PAGE_MASK definitionAt least we could add something like:No, we should just fix PAGE_ALIGN. It should work correctly when
#ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
#define PAGE_ALIGN64(addr) (((((addr)+PAGE_SIZE-1))>>PAGE_SHIFT)<<PAGE_SHIFT)
#else
#define PAGE_ALIGN64(addr) PAGE_ALIGN(addr)
#endif
But IMHO the single PAGE_ALIGN64() implementation is more clear.
passed a long-long. Otherwse it's just a timebomb.
This:
#define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ({ \
typeof(addr) __size = PAGE_SIZE; \
typeof(addr) __mask = PAGE_MASK; \
(addr + __size - 1) & __mask; \
})
(with a suitable comment) does what we want. I didn't check to see
whether this causes the compiler to generate larger code, but it
shouldn't.
(from include/asm-x86/page.h for example):
/* PAGE_SHIFT determines the page size */
#define PAGE_SHIFT 12
#define PAGE_SIZE (_AC(1,UL) << PAGE_SHIFT)
#define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1))
The "~" is performed on a 32-bit value, so everything in "and" with
PAGE_MASK greater than 4GB will be truncated to the 32-bit boundary.
OK, I oversimplified my testcase.
What do you think about the following?
#define PAGE_SIZE64 (1ULL << PAGE_SHIFT)
#define PAGE_MASK64 (~(PAGE_SIZE64 - 1))
#define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ({ \
typeof(addr) __size = PAGE_SIZE; \
typeof(addr) __ret = (addr) + __size - 1; \
__ret > -1UL ? __ret & PAGE_MASK64 : __ret & PAGE_MASK; \
})
Complex. And I'd worry about added code overhead.
What about
#define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ALIGN(addr, PAGE_SIZE)
?
afaict ALIGN() tries to do the right thing, and if it doesn't, we
should fix ALIGN().