Hi all,
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Hi Daniel,I attached dmesg and config , both from working 2.6.26-rc5 with git-acpi patch below and from linux-next snapshot 20080604.
Could you please provide full dmesg and acpidump outputs?
I also attached acpidump that was done while using stock 2.6.25-fw5 from my distro. (But I think that doesnt matter, at least it shouldn't ;)
Daniel Exner wrote:wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:30:28 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To clarify myself:wrote:Andrew Morton wrote:
(cc linux-acpi)
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:12 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sorry for the delay.. real-life you know ;)OK, thanks.Indeed.. just tried it with (nearly) the same config: no unable toHi!I assume 2.6.26-rc5 is OK?
(Added myself to CC, because I'm not subscribed)
with linux-next snapshot 20080604 my Laptop morphes into sitting duck
and I think this is due to this:
locate IOAPIC
Will try todays next snapshot above -rc5 now.
It would be great if you could test 2.6.26-rc5 plus
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-acpi.patch. That'll allow us to
confirm that the regression is due to changes in the acpi tree.
I guess you'd expect me to confirm the behavior on rc5 with this patch
aplied, but .. well this Kernel works!
2.6.25.5: --> relatively fast no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5: --> relatively no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5 + git-acpi Patch: --> relatively no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5 + linux-next snapshot 20080604 --> even slower than before my ide Patch many "unable to locate IOAPIC" Errors
So I think the problem lies not in the acpi tree but somewhre else.
Is it possible to tell git to explicitly _exclude_ a specific tree while bisecting?
--
Greetings
Daniel Exner