Re: Regression: boot failure on AMD Elan TS-5500
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Mon Jun 16 2008 - 13:08:37 EST
Sean Young wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 06:37:12AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2008 22:11:39 Sean Young wrote:
The symptons are either a crash or reboot on booting the kernel. No
printk's have occurred yet -- even with early printk on.
2.6.15 worked on this board however current does not. I've bisected it to:
commit a24e785111a32ccb7cebafd24b1b1cb474ea8e5d
Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun Oct 21 16:41:35 2007 -0700
i386: paravirt boot sequence
Hi Sean,
Thanks for tracking this down. Can we try reverting this in pieces to
see exactly what the cause was?
1) Revert arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.S
2) If that doesn't fix it, Try removing the 8 lines which were added to
arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
And the arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc_32.c change too, just in case...
Reverting only head_32.S makes the problem go away. I didn't try any other
changes.
I assume this is CONFIG_PARAVIRT=n?
Indeed.
What bootloader does this platform use? I wonder if it's setting things
up in an unexpected way?
It's syslinux. That must be the culprit, considering the change to head_32.S.
I'm digging in syslinux right now.
Weird. That change has been in there a fairly long time now, and lots of
people have successfully used syslinux to boot it in that time. Must be
some specific combination of factors on your platform.
I would guess the KEEP_SEGMENTS flag is being set for some reason, but
it's hard to imagine how, unless there's some memory corruption going on.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/