Re: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework of "prioritize non-migratabletasks over migratable ones"

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 19:59 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:

> One way or another, we have different aritifacts (and mine have likely
> more) but conceptually, both "violates" POSIX if a strict round-robin
> scheduling is required.

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_08.html#tag_02_08_04_01

Is quite strict on what FIFO should do, and I know of two points where
we deviate and should work to match.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/