Re: architectures with ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT but no binfmt_aout

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:29:09PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 14:23 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Sorting these alphabetically will result in less merge conflicts when
> > the list grows.
> 
> Maybe, but it doesn't grow that fast -- and it's small enough that if I
> add stuff in the middle, the context will cover the whole thing and
> cause a merge conflict either way. And it isn't in alphabetical order
> now either :)
I know and I know.
If someone did the janitorial effort and converted all the
per-arch defined symbols to one single definiton
and select the list would grow rapidly.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/