Re: Does anyone run AXFS in 2.4 version of kernel ? I am trying my best to apply AXFS patches into 2.4.18
From: Bob Zhang
Date: Tue Jun 17 2008 - 10:58:17 EST
Today I carefully read the mkfs.axfs.c , I finally make clear about
the axfs is how to organize the structure ,including the spec of super
,and the content of region , and how to store the file content in
different region are .
Jared Hulber is a great programmer , this is a very complex thing .
I am ready for writing a document about I have known for more newbies for axfs.
----
In fact , yesterday , I asked a stupid question to Jared Hulbert , the
information from /proc/axfs/volume0 is engough to create a valid xml
file .
for example ,from
./bin/busybox,0,18
./bin/busybox,28672,2
./bin/busybox,53248,4
./bin/busybox,143360,3
./bin/busybox,147456,3
./bin/busybox,151552,8
./bin/busybox,155648,11
we can know the page of offset 0 is called 18 times ,compared with
other pages , it should be set XIP.
<xipfsmap>
<file>
<name>
./bin/busybox
</name>
<chunk>
<size>4096</size>
<offset>0</offset> //maybe we need convert it from /proc info
</chunk>
</file>
</xipfsmap>
the advantage of AXFS is that we can set every page to be XIP , so the
size is certainly 4096. but if we think like this , the size item in
the xml is useless, I think maybe Jared Hulber want to provide some
lazy method to set contiguous pages to be XIP , you don't need to
write some chunk . but I feel that the chance of contiguous pages are
read is not high , so for us , setting every page is enough .
if we want to set many pages to be XIP , we should write many chunk items .
Am I right , Mr Hulbert ?
Best Regards,
Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/