Re: BUG: mmapfile/writev spurious zero bytes (x86_64/not i386,bisected, reproducable)
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Jun 17 2008 - 17:21:30 EST
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Hmm. Something like this *may* salvage it.
>
> Untested, so far (I'll reboot and test soon enough), but even if it fixes
> things, it's not really very good.
Ok, so I just rebooted with this, and it does indeed fix the bug.
I'd be happier with a more complete fix (ie being byte-accurate and
actually doing the partial copy when it hits a fault in the middle), but
this seems to be the minimal fix, and at least fixes the totally bogus
return values from the x86-64 __copy_user*() functions.
Not that I checked that I got _all_ cases correct (and maybe there are
other versions of __copy_user that I missed entirely), but Bron's
test-case at least seems to work properly for me now.
Bron? If you have a more complete test-suite (ie the real-world case that
made you find this), it would be good to verify the whole thing.
And again, this is the kind of thing that really wants others looking at
it. I personally think that this thing should likely be written as C code,
with just the inner loops done as asm (ie the inner "rep movsq" and the
inner 64-byte unrolled cached/uncached copies done as inline asms, and
then the outer layers could be C).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/