Re: [PATCH 0/7] mmc: at91_mci: rework to allow better transfer

[Nicolas Ferre]

Pierre Ossman :
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:54:41 +0200
> Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Russell King highlights that patch #4 is not well inserted in the series 
> > : it have to be after #5 (after correcting bytes_xfered update).
> >
> > If you want I can reorder them... or you manage to do it.
> >
> > I will take into account Marc's comment and new Ville patch series in 
> > another round ;-)
>
> Will you redo this series, or are you planning further patches? (i.e.
> should I merge this set or wait for an update?)

You can merge this patch series (7 patches)

You can also merge
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080610.092729.beef9e64.en.html
"at91_mci: manage cmd error and data error independently" (1 patch)

And 3 patches from Ville Syrjälä that I have just signed:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080614.172720.dd0e776e.en.html
"at91_mci: AT91SAM9260/9263 12 byte write erratum (v2)"


http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080609.190644.3f64ff91.en.html
"at91_mci: Cover more AT91RM9200 and AT91SAM9261 errata."


http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080609.190645.2998e511.en.html
"at91_mci: Fix byte mode transitions."

=> 11 patches.

Thanks a lot, regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/