Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>   
> > On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 04:30 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >   
> >     
> > > The only current user of this interface is mprotect
> > >     
> > >       
> > Do you plan to use it with fork ultimately ?
> >   
> >     
>
> Good point, I'd overlooked that.  I guess that means using it in 
> ptep_set_wrprotect().
Along the lines of:

--- a/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h	Wed Jun 18 13:54:49 2008 -0700
+++ b/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h	Wed Jun 18 17:03:39 2008 -0700
@@ -491,7 +491,11 @@
static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
				      unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
{
-	clear_bit(_PAGE_BIT_RW, (unsigned long *)&ptep->pte);
+	pte_t pte = ptep_modify_prot_start(mm, addr, ptep);
+	
+	pte = pte_wrprotect(pte);
+
+	ptep_modify_prot_commit(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
	pte_update(mm, addr, ptep);
}


	J

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/