Re: [crash, bisected] Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86_64: Fold pda into per cpuarea

[Mike Travis]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> 
> BTW, I think __per_cpu_load will cause trouble if you make a relocatable
> kernel, being an absolute symbol.  But I have relocation off at the moment.
> 
...
Here's where it's defined (in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h):

#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ZERO_BASED_PER_CPU
#define PERCPU(align)                                                   \
        . = ALIGN(align);                                               \
        percpu : { } :percpu                                            \
        __per_cpu_load = .;                                             \
        .data.percpu 0 : AT(__per_cpu_load - LOAD_OFFSET) {             \
                *(.data.percpu.first)                                   \
                *(.data.percpu.shared_aligned)                          \
                *(.data.percpu)                                         \
                *(.data.percpu.page_aligned)                            \
                ____per_cpu_size = .;                                   \
        }                                                               \
        . = __per_cpu_load + ____per_cpu_size;                          \
        data : { } :data
#else

Can we generate a new symbol which would account for LOAD_OFFSET?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/