Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transactionabstraction
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Fri Jun 20 2008 - 15:19:27 EST
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> Blows up on "gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)":
Yeah, I was a bit worried about that. Gcc sometimes does insane things.
We literally just tested that the asm should only _ever_ be generated with
a constant value, but if some gcc dead-code removal thing doesn't work, it
will then screw up and try to generate the asm even for a non-constant
thing.
The fairly trivial fix is probably to just change the "i" to "ir", safe in
the knowledge that any _sane_ case will never use the "r" possibility. I
suspect even your insane case will end up then killing the bad choice
later.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/