Re: [Experimental][PATCH] putback_lru_page rework

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> Quick update:  
> 
> With this patch applied, at ~ 1.5 hours into the test, my system panic'd
> [panic_on_oops set] with a BUG in __find_get_block() -- looks like the
> BUG_ON() in check_irqs_on() called from bh_lru_install() inlined by
> __find_get_block().  Before the panic occurred, I saw warnings from
> native_smp_call_function_mask() [arch/x86/kernel/smp.c]--also because
> irqs_disabled().
> 
> I'll back out the changes [spin_[un]lock() => spin_[un]lock_irq()] to
> shrink_inactive_list() and try again.  Just a hunch.

Yup.
Kamezawa-san's patch remove local_irq_enable(), but don't remove
local_irq_disable().
thus, irq is never enabled.

> -	spin_unlock(&zone->lru_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>  done:
> -	local_irq_enable();



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/