Re: [RFC][Patch 2/2] markers: example of irq regular kernel markers

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> Peter, I thought, we were discussing what interface we could accept,
> not how many or where tracepoints we could accept. Or, am I misreading?
> 
> I know that if someone pushes markers into kernel in his own sweet way,
> of course, the kernel code will be bloated endlessly. But I also know
> why we review patches and send Ack/Nack before merging them to the tree.
> (If you still worry about it, we might be able to make linux-markers
> git tree, and review all regular markers on it)

Indeed.

if necessary, I can maintain this tree.
(because, I hope marker is independent by LTTng and SystemTap.
 So, I am no related any tracer in this discussion member.)

but, at first,
We should review and discuss to Mathieu's new tracepoint proposal.
I think that is good idea.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/