Re: [patch 02/19] perfmon2 minimal v2: base code

From: stephane eranian
Date: Mon Jun 23 2008 - 07:37:29 EST


Stephen,

This is a good comment. I check the perfmon subdir and there is indeed
no need to go
there when CONFIG_PERFMON is not set. I have made the change now.

Thanks.


On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Stephane,
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:02:10 -0700 (PDT) eranian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> +++ o/perfmon/Makefile 2008-06-17 08:33:23.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>> +#
>> +# Copyright (c) 2005-2006 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
>> +# Contributed by Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxx>
>> +#
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PERFMON) = perfmon_ctx.o \
>> + perfmon_file.o perfmon_attach.o \
>> + perfmon_res.o perfmon_init.o
>
>> +++ o/Makefile 2008-06-17 08:34:19.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@
>>
>>
>> ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> -core-y += kernel/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/ block/
>> +core-y += kernel/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/ block/ perfmon/
>
> Is there some reason that this is not
>
> core-$(CONFIG_PERFMON) += perfmon/
>
> and then you could just use "obj-y" in perfmon/Makefile
>
> Or are there going to be things in perfmon/ that need building if
> CONFIG_PERFMON is not set?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/