Re: [patch 2/3] vfs: fix sys_getcwd for detached mounts
From: Al Viro
Date: Mon Jun 23 2008 - 10:41:19 EST
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:34:00PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > After the patch it will give a much saner "/skel" result.
> >
> > I'm not sure that /skel is much saner, to be honest.
>
> Just for argument's sake: before the patch getcwd() on detached object
> wasn't consistent with any definition of "absolute path". After the
> patch it's at least consistent with defining it as the path from the
> ultimate reachable ancestor (which does have at least some historical
> relevance).
Before the patch getcwd() on detached object generated junk, period.
As for the path from ultimate reachable ancestor... I'm not sure that
this definition actually matches any real-world problem.
> > Existing
> > behaviour is BS, no arguments about that, but I suspect that
> > we want that to be recognizable. How about doing something
> > like detached:<rest of path> instead (c.f. "pipe:[6969]" and
> > its ilk)?
>
> OK, obviously current users don't care, otherwise somebody would have
> complained about this issue. So if we agree on "detached:...", I'm
> fine with that.
Care to resend? BTW, one more thing - in the 1/3 I'd probably add a
wrapper around prepend() that would take struct qstr * instead of
name/length and used it instead of your locals. As in
prepend_name(&end, &buflen, &dentry->d_name)
etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/