Re: Spinlocks: Factor our GENERIC_LOCKBREAK in order to avoid spinwith irqs disable

From: Petr Tesarik
Date: Mon Jun 23 2008 - 13:19:32 EST


On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 11:49 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Subject: Spinlocks: Factor our GENERIC_LOCKBREAK in order to avoid spin with irqs disabled
>
> The nice spinlock functions that enable interrupts while spinning are only
> usable if GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is set (and we do not debug locks but lock
> debugging would not be used for a production configuration).
>
> Factor out the dependencies on the ->lock_break field from the nice functions
> into a set of BREAKLOCK macros (cannot be functions since the type of the lock
> variable varies).
>
> The nice spinlock function can then also be used if !GENERIC_LOCKBREAK
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> kernel/spinlock.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/spinlock.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/spinlock.c 2008-05-07 11:19:31.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/spinlock.c 2008-05-07 11:40:56.000000000 -0700
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_write_trylock);
> * even on CONFIG_PREEMPT, because lockdep assumes that interrupts are
> * not re-enabled during lock-acquire (which the preempt-spin-ops do):
> */
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC

Maybe I'm just blind, but doesn't this change effectively disable any
arch-specific optimized code for _raw_*_lock?

If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is set, then CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK must also
be set, so in that case the debugging versions of _raw_*_lock are used.
But if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is _not_ set, then the locks are built
with _trylock and _can_lock primitives.

What am I missing here?

Petr Tesarik


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/