Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24/25: random lockups when accessing externalUSB harddrive

[Alan Stern]

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Stefan Becker wrote:

> >>> I get random machine lockups when accessing my USB harddrive with 
> >>> kernels 2.6.24/25. They don't occur with kernel 2.6.23. During testing I 
> >>> figured out that it has something to do with the USB Bluetooth adaptor. 
> >>> If I remove it before the testing I don't get any lockups.
> > 
> > Does the same problem still occur in 2.6.26-rc7?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
> >  Does it occur if you rmmod ehci-hcd?
> 
> Yes, i.e. it also happens when the external hardrive runs as USB 1.1 
> device with 12mpbs.
> 
> 
> > Machine lockups are awfully hard to debug.  Can you get any information
> > at all (like Alt-SysRq-T) when this happens?
> 
> SysRq does not work when the machine locks up. I forgot to mention that 
> the test machine is a single CPU machine and that the CPU fan starts to 
> run full speed when the lockup occurs.
> 
> Guessing from the commit returned by git bisect there is a locking 
> error, i.e. the CPU runs into a spinlock that is already locked and 
> therefore busy loops.

That is certainly possible.  But an error like that should affect lots 
of different people and computers, not just your one machine.

> > Can you add debugging
> > printk statements to the USB bluetooth driver to try and localize where
> > the hang occurs?
> 
> Any suggestions where to start?

Around every place where the driver calls into the core.  You might 
also want to debug the places where uhci-hcd acquires and releases 
spinlocks.

> >>> git bisect resulted in the following bad commit:
> >>>
> >>> e9df41c5c5899259541dc928872cad4d07b82076 is first bad commit
> >>> commit e9df41c5c5899259541dc928872cad4d07b82076
> >>> Author: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Date:   Wed Aug 8 11:48:02 2007 -0400
> >>>
> >>>     USB: make HCDs responsible for managing endpoint queues
> > 
> > Knowing this doesn't help much without more information.
> 
> Too bad. Each bisect cycle took 2-3 hours and the whole process took me 
> 3 days :-( :-(

I didn't mean that your efforts were wasted.  They just don't help much 
at this point; maybe later on they will be more useful.

> That commit has spinlock changes so I hoped that it would be a good 
> starting point. Is there a way to track the locks?

Only what I suggested: Print something in the log whenever a lock is 
acquired or released.

> > Do you have any idea why nobody else has reported this sort of problem?  
> > Is it reproducible on other machines?
> 
> I attached both USB devices to another, newer dual core laptop. I 
> couldn't reproduce the problem there, even when I simulated a single CPU 
> machine with maxcpus=1.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/