Re: [patch] x86 supports NO_IRQ convention

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 04:28 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 23 June 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > NO_IRQ on x86 is 0
> 
> There is no such #define for it.
> And since zero is used for timer IRQs, it's not invalid.

I'll refer you to past discussions with Linus here. 0 is invalid to
drivers for all intend and purposes.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/