Re: [PATCH 1/3] introduce PF_KTHREAD flag

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:47:06 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't yet know how much additional damage will happen as a result.

Lots.

I restored the patches and just dropped the hunk:

  static int has_mm(struct task_struct *p)
  {
-       return (p->mm && !(p->flags & PF_BORROWED_MM));
  }
  
  /**
--- 86,92 ----
  
  static int has_mm(struct task_struct *p)
  {
+       return (p->mm && !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD));
  }

due to that function having been turned into:

static inline bool should_send_signal(struct task_struct *p)
{
        return !(p->flags & PF_FREEZER_NOSIG);
}

Please check the result?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/