Re: [PATCH] x86: introduce init_memory_mapping for 32bit
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Tue Jun 24 2008 - 13:17:20 EST
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> so could use mem below max_low_pfn as early. could move several
>> function more early instead of waiting after paging_init including
>> moving relocate_initrd early, and kva related early done in
>> initmem_init
>
> applied to tip/x86/setup-memory - thanks Yinghai.
>
> a sidenote:
>
>> 6 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
> this patch is too large - if it causes any problems it will not be very
> easy to figure out which exact change caused the problems.
>
> Lets hope it goes all fine - but in the future lets try doing
> more+smaller patches, especially if they change some known-dangerous
> area of the kernel.
>
> For example here a better splitup would have been to do 5 or more
> patches:
>
> 1) first introduce init_memory_mapping() [but dont use it anywhere]
> 2) add the init_memory_mapping() call to setup_arch()
> 3) move remap_numa_kva()
> 4) move relocate_initrd()
> 5) remove the now unnecessary setup from paging_init()
>
> ... or something like that. The point is to manage risk: if there's
> multiple problem areas that a change is touching, try to isolate them
> from each other and introduce the change gradually.
>
> The end result is still exactly the same, but much more
> reviewable/debuggable/bisectable.
actually i added and tested that one by one. let me check if i split
that into 5.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/