Re: [bug] Re: [PATCH] - Fix stack overflow for large values of MAX_APICS
From: Jack Steiner
Date: Wed Jun 25 2008 - 16:57:02 EST
>> >
>> > -tip auto-testing found a new boot failure on x86 which happens if
>> > NR_CPUS is changed from 8 to 4096. The hang goes like this:
>> >
>>
>> Still looking but here is what I have found so far.
>>
>> The most obvious change was to revert the patch that changed MAX_APICS to
>> 32k. With this patch reverted, the system still hangs at the same spot.
>>
>> I also noticed that the hang is random. It usually occurs at acpi_event_init()
>> but sometimes it hangs at a different place.
>>
>> I also observed that the failure sometimes does not occur. The system
>> boots to the point that mounting /root fails, then panics because the mount
>> fails. I expect that this is a different failure due to missing drivers.
>> I'll chase that down later.
>>
>>
>> I added trace code & isolated the hang to a call to synchronize_rcu().
>> Usually from netlink_change_ngroups().
>>
>> If I boot with "maxcpus=1, it never hangs (obviously) but always fails
>> to mount /root.
>>
>> Next I changed NR_CPUS to 128. I still see random hangs.
>>
>>
>> I'll chase this more tomorrow. Has anyone else seen any failures that might be
>> related???
>>
>>
Is this already fixed? I see a number of patches to this area have been merged
since the failure occurred.
I added enough hacks to get backtraces on threads at the time a hang occurs.
show_state() shows 79 "kstopmachine" tasks. Most have one of the following backtraces:
<6>kstopmachine R running task 6400 375 369
ffff8101ad28bd80 ffffffff8068c5c6 ffff8101ad28bb20 0000000000000002
0000000000000046 0000000000000000 0000000000002f42 ffff8101ad28c8b8
ffff8101ad28bb90 ffffffff80254fac 0000000100000000 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8068c5c6>] ? thread_return+0x4d/0xbd
[<ffffffff80254fac>] ? __lock_acquire+0x643/0x6ad
[<ffffffff80212507>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xc
[<ffffffff8022cf41>] ? update_curr_rt+0x111/0x11a
[<ffffffff80212507>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xc
[<ffffffff8068c5f2>] ? thread_return+0x79/0xbd
[<ffffffff8068ef48>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x37
[<ffffffff8068c5f2>] ? thread_return+0x79/0xbd
[<ffffffff80254fac>] ? __lock_acquire+0x643/0x6ad
[<ffffffff80212507>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xc
[<ffffffff8068c806>] wait_for_common+0x150/0x160
[<ffffffff8068ef48>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x37
[<ffffffff80254fac>] ? __lock_acquire+0x643/0x6ad
[<ffffffff80212507>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xc
[<ffffffff8023422b>] ? sys_sched_yield+0x0/0x6e
[<ffffffff8026736d>] ? stopmachine+0xaf/0xda
[<ffffffff8020d558>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x12
[<ffffffff802672be>] ? stopmachine+0x0/0xda
[<ffffffff8020d54e>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x12
<6>kstopmachine ? 0000000000000000 6400 367 1
ffff8101af9b9ee0 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 ffff8101af9b4000 ffff8101afdc0000 ffff8101af9b4540
0000000600000000 00000000ffff909f ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8023be98>] do_exit+0x6fe/0x702
[<ffffffff8020d55f>] child_rip+0x11/0x12
[<ffffffff802672be>] ? stopmachine+0x0/0xda
[<ffffffff8020d54e>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x12
The boot thread shows:
<6>swapper D 0000000000000002 2640 1 0
ffff8101afc3fcd0 0000000000000046 ffffffff807d8341 0000000000000200
ffffffff807d8335 ffff8101afc40000 ffff8101ad284000 ffff8101afc40540
00000005afc3faa0 ffffffff8021e837 ffff8101afc3fab0 ffff8101afc3fd50
[<ffffffff8068c961>] schedule_timeout+0x27/0xb9
[<ffffffff8068ef48>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x37
[<ffffffff8068c79c>] wait_for_common+0xe6/0x160
[<ffffffff8022d88a>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0xf
[<ffffffff8068c8a0>] wait_for_completion+0x18/0x1a
[<ffffffff8024981a>] synchronize_rcu+0x3a/0x41
[<ffffffff802498a3>] ? wakeme_after_rcu+0x0/0x15
[<ffffffff805d8e1b>] netlink_change_ngroups+0xce/0xfc
[<ffffffff805da2c9>] genl_register_mc_group+0xfd/0x160
[<ffffffff80ac6d5d>] ? acpi_event_init+0x0/0x57
[<ffffffff80ac6d92>] acpi_event_init+0x35/0x57
[<ffffffff80aaca8c>] kernel_init+0x1c5/0x31f
Is this hang already fixed or should I dig deeper?
--- jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/