Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix documentation bug about relocatability
From: Simon Horman
Date:  Tue Jul 01 2008 - 08:06:25 EST
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:55:18PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> This patch fixes a small bug in documentation: x86_64 also has now
> the ability to build a relocatable kernel.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: mon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt b/Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt
> index b8e52c0..9691c7f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt
> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ There are two possible methods of using Kdump.
>  2) Or use the system kernel binary itself as dump-capture kernel and there is
>     no need to build a separate dump-capture kernel. This is possible
>     only with the architecutres which support a relocatable kernel. As
> -   of today i386 and ia64 architectures support relocatable kernel.
> +   of today, i386, x86_64 and ia64 architectures support relocatable kernel.
>  
>  Building a relocatable kernel is advantageous from the point of view that
>  one does not have to build a second kernel for capturing the dump. But
> -- 
> 1.5.6
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
-- 
Horms
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/