Re: [PATCH] x86: Simple changes to make traps_32.c and traps_64.c more similar

[Alexander van Heukelum]

On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:50:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> nice. In terms of functionality, it is supposed to be a pure 
> no-changes-intended commit, correct?
> 
> In that case it makes sense to split it in two: in the first (larger) 
> bit put the things that are provably invariant on the .o and can be 
> verified that way.
> 
> In the second one, put the things that change the .o output slightly 
> (variable reordering can do that) - this we have to check more closely.
> 
> (One can normally do such a splitup by editing the raw diff and 
> splitting it in half that way - by sorting each chunk into the 
> appropriate target patch - and then making sure the end result is still 
> the same.)

Hi,

I ended up redoing it. The first patch has no influence on the generated
code; the second one does not change code size and the others are more
or less single logical changes.

I sent the patches as a reply to the original patch (replying to this one
would have been more logical... I need some sleep now). I tested compilation
and using qemu after patch 1, 2, and 7. They all run fine.

Greetings,
    Alexander

> 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/