Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for64-bit Xen support

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
> > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >     
> > > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >       
> > > > Excluding the x86/xen-64bit topic solves the problem.
> > > >
> > > > It triggered on two 64-bit machines so it seems readily reproducible  
> > > > with that config.
> > > >
> > > > i've pushed the failing tree out to tip/tmp.xen-64bit.Tue_Jul__1_10_55
> > > >   
> > > >         
> > > The patch to fix this is on tip/x86/unify-setup: "x86: setup_arch() && 
> > > early_ioremap_init()".  Logically that patch should probably be in the 
> > > xen64 branch, since it's only meaningful with the early_ioremap 
> > > unification.
> > >       
> > ah, indeed - it was missing from tip/master due to:
> >
> > | commit ac998c259605741efcfbd215533b379970ba1d9f
> > | Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > | Date:   Mon Jun 30 12:01:31 2008 +0200
> > |
> > |    Revert "x86: setup_arch() && early_ioremap_init()"
> > |
> > |    This reverts commit 181b3601a1a7d2ac3ace6b23cb3204450a4f9a27.
> >
> > because that change needed the other changes from xen-64bit.
> >
> > will retry tomorrow.
> >     
>
> ok, i've re-added x86/xen-64bit and it's looking good in testing so far.
>   

Great.  I'm hoping this stuff will be OK for the next merge, so I'm 
primed for fast turnaround bugfixes ;)

Also, I have the series of followup patches to actually implement 64-bit 
Xen which have much less impact on the non-Xen parts of the tree.  I'll 
probably mail them out later today.

Thanks,
   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/