Re: [PATCH 1/2] Support for the at91sam9g20 : Atmel 400Mhz ARM 926ej-sSOC
From: Sedji Gaouaou
Date: Fri Jul 04 2008 - 04:55:13 EST
Hi Russel,
Russell King - ARM Linux a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 04:19:17PM +0200, Sedji Gaouaou wrote:
Hi Andrew,
+/*
+ * MCI (SD/MMC)
+ */
+static struct at91_mmc_data __initdata ek_mmc_data = {
+ .slot_b = 1,
+ .wire4 = 1,
+// .det_pin = ... not connected
+// .wp_pin = ... not connected
+// .vcc_pin = ... not connected
Please make these a proper comment, preferably inside the comment before
the structure. C++ comments are frowned upon in the kernel's source.
I would like to know what do you suggest about this comment? Indeed we
already use this kind of comments, for instance in board-sam9260ek.c. I
don't mind changing it into the proper comment form, but I would like to
know first what do you suggest.
Documentation/CodingStyle:
|
| Chapter 8: Commenting
|
...
|
|Linux style for comments is the C89 "/* ... */" style.
|Don't use C99-style "// ..." comments.
So how about:
/*
* MCI (SD/MMC)
* det_pin, wp_pin and vcc_pin are not connected
*/
static struct at91_mmc_data __initdata ek_mmc_data = {
.slot_b = 1,
.wire4 = 1,
};
It is fine for me, I will change the patch with the proper style for
comments.
BTW I have found the problem in the patch on the patch system, so I will
change that too.
Thank you for your help and comments.
Regards,
Sedji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/