Re: mmap'ed memory in core files ?

[Philippe De Muyter]

On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:33:14AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
>> Philippe De Muyter wrote:
>>> drivers/ieee1394/dma.c:
>>>     int dma_region_mmap(struct dma_region *dma, struct file *file,
>>> 			struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>>     {
>>>     [...]
>>>     vma->vm_ops = &dma_region_vm_ops;
>>>     vma->vm_private_data = dma;
>>>     vma->vm_file = file;
>>>     vma->vm_flags |= VM_RESERVED;
>>>
>>>     return 0;
>>>     }
>>>
>>> So, actually the zone I would like to get dumped in the core file is 
>>> tagged
>>> VM_RESERVED.
>>>
>>> I see the following ways to solve my problem :
>>>     - do not tag the zone as VM_RESERVED in ieee1394::dma_region_mmap
>>>     - tag the zone as VM_ALWAYSDUMP in ieee1394::dma_region_mmap
>>>     - add a bit in coredump_filter to dump the VM_RESERVED zones.
>>>
>>> As I don't know the real meaning of VM_RESERVED, I do not know which 
>>> choice
>>> is the best one for the official kernel tree,
>
> I don't know these things either.  But among else, VM_RESERVED prevents a 
> vma from being swapped out.  Makes kind of sense, given that besides the 
> CPUs also the FireWire controller writes to this memory.
>
>>> but locally I'll go for
>>> adding VM_ALWAYSDUMP in ieee1394::dma_region_mmap.
>> I'm afraid I don't know real usages of VM_RESERVED and VM_IO, either.
>> Allowing everyone to choose whether dump the dma region or not,
>> perhaps we need to introduce a new VM flag (e.g. VM_DUMPABLE) and
>> a coredump_filter bit which controls (VM_IO | VM_RESERVED) &&
>> VM_DUMPABLE area, for example.
>> I think it is also OK to just add VM_ALWAYSDUMP flag to the dma
>> region if the device driver knows the region is safely readable
>> and small enough.
>
> It is safely readable.  I don't know if it is small enough.  The size of 
> the DMA buffer is AFAIK chosen by userspace (by the application program or 
> maybe a library) which uses the character device file ABIs for isochronous 
> FireWire IO of raw1394, video1394, or dv1394.

For video1394, the size of the buffer is N times the size of a frame, with
N choosen by the application but small (let say < 32).  The size of the
frame depends on the camera.  I have already worked with 8bpp 1600x1200 cameras,but with a smaller N in that case.

1600x1200x32 gives 60M.  If they were allocated by malloc instead of by mmap,
they would be dumped in the core files without any question about the size.

So I think we may consider the 'small enough' criteria is met.

Best regards

Philippe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/