[PATCH] padlock: don't whinge when loaded on a non-VIA cpu

From: Kyle McMartin
Date: Tue Jul 08 2008 - 15:04:37 EST


I've become seriously tired of seeing these messages on every machine
running an i386 Fedora kernel...

padlock: VIA PadLock not detected.
padlock: VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected.

So let's eliminate them!

Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kmcmartin@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c b/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c
index bb30eb9..c11f456 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c
@@ -384,6 +384,9 @@ static int __init padlock_init(void)
{
int ret;

+ if (!(boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
if (!cpu_has_xcrypt) {
printk(KERN_ERR PFX "VIA PadLock not detected.\n");
return -ENODEV;
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c b/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c
index c666b4e..9b360fb 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c
@@ -253,6 +253,9 @@ static int __init padlock_init(void)
{
int rc = -ENODEV;

+ if (!(boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
if (!cpu_has_phe) {
printk(KERN_ERR PFX "VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected.\n");
return -ENODEV;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/