Re: [PATCH v2] handle failure of irqchip->set_type in setup_irq

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Wed Jul 09 2008 - 09:14:27 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:43:07 +0200 Uwe Kleine-K__nig <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > I wonder if we can do better.
> > > Let me think about that.
> > I was about to suggest something like:
> >
> > /* WARNING: this returns a static pointer, so you cannot use the
> > * returned value after another call to creative_function_name
> > */
> > char *creative_function_name(void *addr)
> > {
> > static char buf[SOME_LENGTH];
> >
> > ... format symbol name into buf ...
> >
> > return buf;
> > }
> >
> > Then I could have used
> >
> > pr_err("setting flow type for irq %u failed (%s)\n",
> > irq, creative_function_name(chip->set_type));
> >
> > which looks definitely nicer.
>
> Better would be
>
> char buf[ENOUGH /* rofl */];
>
> pr_err("setting flow type for irq %u failed (%s)\n",
> irq, render_function_name(buf, chip->set_type));
>
> However I'm presently brewing up a plot to do this:
>
> printk("function name is %Ss\n", (unsigned long *)chip->set_type);
>
> which I think will work. We can also do
>
> printk("IP address is %Si\n", (unsigned long *)ip_address_buffer);
>
> to replace NIPQUAD. And similar printk extensions.
>
> Am still thinking about it though.
I assume the result is 0fe1ef24f7bd0020f29ffe287dfdb9ead33ca0b2?

Should I send a new version using %pF or is it easier if you fix up the
patch?

Best regards
Uwe

--
Uwe Kleine-König, Software Engineer
Digi International GmbH Branch Breisach, Küferstrasse 8, 79206 Breisach, Germany
Tax: 315/5781/0242 / VAT: DE153662976 / Reg. Amtsgericht Dortmund HRB 13962
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/