Re: [patch 05/15] LTTng instrumentation - scheduler (repost)

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Ingo Molnar (mingo@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > There were 2 rejects when I ported the patch to linux-next. Sorry. 
> > Here is a repost.
> 
> there's still a standing objection (NAK) from Peter Zijstra so none of 
> this can go into linux-next yet i'm afraid.
> 
> 	Ingo

Hi Ingo,

This "tracepoint" infrastructure has been created to answer to Peter's
concerns about trace_mark uglyness. The last comment I had from him when
we discussed the tracepoint idea was "Looking forward to your
proposal..", so I guess it's up to him to decide if tracepoints are
clean enough to live.

I'll submit a revised scheduler instrumentation which turns all
scheduler trace_mark() already in linux-next into tracepoints, with the
same arguments. ftrace will have to be updated accordingly.

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/