Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the problem is, we cannot just put it even into tip/master if there's no 
> short-term hope of fixing a problem it triggers. gcc-4.2.3 is solid for 
> me otherwise, for series of thousands of randomly built kernels.

4.2.3 is fine; he was using 4.2.0 before, and as far as I know, 4.2.0 
and 4.2.1 are known broken for the kernel.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/