Re: [PATCH v2] handle failure of irqchip->set_type in setup_irq

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > However I'm presently brewing up a plot to do this:
> > >
> > >         printk("function name is %Ss\n", (unsigned long *)chip->set_type);
> > >
> > > which I think will work.  We can also do
> > >
> > >         printk("IP address is %Si\n", (unsigned long *)ip_address_buffer);
> > >
> > > to replace NIPQUAD.  And similar printk extensions.
> > >
> > > Am still thinking about it though.
> > I assume the result is 0fe1ef24f7bd0020f29ffe287dfdb9ead33ca0b2?
> 
> yup.
When I saw this commit I wondered that it was you who told me to think
about this but the commiter was Linus.
 
> > Should I send a new version using %pF or is it easier if you fix up the
> > patch?
> 
> A new version would be nice, thanks.  Or an incremental diff, but I can and
> will turn new versions into an incremental in the twinkle of an eye, so
> either is OK.
voilà:

--->8---