Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Documentation
From: Elias Oltmanns
Date: Thu Jul 10 2008 - 15:59:39 EST
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is the long awaited ftrace.txt. It explains in quite detail how to
> use ftrace and the various tracers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Exactly what I've just been looking for. Very nice.
As I read through this enlightening peace, I took the liberty to make
some comments where I thought I'd spotted some mistake. Note that I'm
not a native English speaker nor familiar with all the terminology.
Also, I didn't exactly scratch my head when I had a bad feeling about
something but couldn't come up with a better idea straight away.
Basically, I just skimmed through the lines because im interested in the
matter.
Anyway, here it goes:
[...]
> + available_tracers : This holds the different types of tracers that
> + has been compiled into the kernel. The tracers
have
> + listed here can be configured by echoing in their
> + name into current_tracer.
[...]
> + trace_entries : This sets or displays the number of trace
> + entries each CPU buffer can hold. The tracer buffers
> + are the same size for each CPU, so care must be
> + taken when modifying the trace_entries. The number
> + of actually entries will be the number given
actual
> + times the number of possible CPUS. The buffers
> + are saved as individual pages, and the actual entries
> + will always be rounded up to entries per page.
Not sure I understand the last sentence, but may be it's just me not
being familiar with the terminology.
[...]
> + set_ftrace_filter : When dynamic ftrace is configured in, the
> + code is dynamically modified to disable calling
> + of the function profiler (mcount). This lets
> + tracing be configured in with practically no overhead
> + in performance. This also has a side effect of
> + enabling or disabling specific functions to be
> + traced. Echoing in names of functions into this
> + file will limit the trace to only those files.
these functions?
> +
> + set_ftrace_notrace: This has the opposite effect that
> + set_ftrace_filter has. Any function that is added
> + here will not be traced. If a function exists
> + in both set_ftrace_filter and set_ftrace_notrace
(comma)
> + the function will _not_ bet traced.
> +
[...]
> + ftrace - function tracer that uses mcount to trace all functions.
> + It is possible to filter out which functions that are
are to be
> + traced when dynamic ftrace is configured in.
> +
[...]
> + time: This differs from the trace output where as the trace output
> + contained a absolute timestamp. This timestamp is relative
> + to the start of the first entry in the the trace.
double `the'
Actually, the whole description of this item feels a bit awkward.
> +
> + delay: This is just to help catch your eye a bit better. And
> + needs to be fixed to be only relative to the same CPU.
> + The marks is determined by the difference between this
are
> + current trace and the next trace.
> + '!' - greater than preempt_mark_thresh (default 100)
> + '+' - greater than 1 microsecond
> + ' ' - less than or equal to 1 microsecond.
> +
[...]
> +To disable one of the options, echo in the option appended with "no".
prepended?
> +
> + echo noprint-parent > /debug/tracing/iter_ctrl
> +
> +To enable an option, leave off the "no".
> +
> + echo sym-offest > /debug/tracing/iter_ctrl
sym-offset
> +
> +Here are the available options:
[...]
> + sym-offset - Display not only the function name, but also the offset
> + in the function. For example, instead of seeing just
> + "ktime_get" you will see "ktime_get+0xb/0x20"
(comma) (full stop)
[...]
> + hex - similar to raw, but the numbers will be in a hexadecimal format.
(capital S)
> +
> + bin - This will print out the formats in raw binary.
> +
> + block - TBD (needs update)
> +
> + stacktrace - This is one of the options that changes the trace itself.
change
> + When a trace is recorded, so is the stack of functions.
> + This allows for back traces of trace sites.
> +
> + sched-tree - TBD (any users??)
> +
> +
> +sched_switch
> +------------
> +
> +This tracer simply records schedule switches. Here's an example
> +on how to implement it.
use?
[...]
> +When ftrace_enabled is set the tracers will also record the functions
(comma)
> +that are within the trace. The descriptions of the tracers
> +will also show an example with ftrace enabled.
> +
> +
> +irqsoff
> +-------
> +
> +When interrupts are disabled, the CPU can not react to any other
> +external event (besides NMIs and SMIs). This prevents the timer
> +interrupt from triggering or the mouse interrupt from letting the
> +kernel know of a new mouse event. The result is a latency with the
> +reaction time.
> +
> +The irqsoff tracer tracks the time interrupts are disabled and when
when
> +they are re-enabled. When a new maximum latency is hit, it saves off
> +the trace so that it may be retrieved at a later time. Every time a
> +new maximum in reached, the old saved trace is discarded and the new
> +trace is saved.
[...]
> +Note the above had ftrace_enabled not set. If we set the ftrace_enabled
(comma)
> +we get a much larger output:
> +
[...]
> +Here we traced a 50 microsecond latency. But we also see all the
> +functions that were called during that time. Note that enabling
by enabling?
> +function tracing we endure an added overhead. This overhead may
(comma)
> +extend the latency times. But never the less, this trace has provided
> +some very helpful debugging.
debugging information?
> +
> +
> +preemptoff
> +----------
> +
> +When preemption is disabled we may be able to receive interrupts but
(comma)
> +the task can not be preempted and a higher priority task must wait
> +for preemption to be enabled again before it can preempt a lower
> +priority task.
> +
> +The preemptoff tracer traces the places that disables preemption.
disable
> +Like the irqsoff, it records the maximum latency that preemption
> +was disabled. The control of preemptoff is much like the irqsoff.
[...]
> +Notice that the __do_softirq when called doesn't have a preempt_count.
> +It may seem that we missed a preempt enabled. What really happened
> +is that the preempt count is held on the threads stack and we
> +switched to the softirq stack (4K stacks in effect). The code
> +does not copy the preempt count, but because interrupts are disabled
(comma)
> +we don't need to worry about it. Having a tracer like this is good
> +to let people know what really happens inside the kernel.
[...]
> +To record this time, use the preemptirqsoff tracer.
> +
> +Again, using this trace is much like the irqsoff and preemptoff tracers.
> +
> + # echo preemptoff > /debug/tracing/current_tracer
preemptirqsoff
> + # echo 0 > /debug/tracing/tracing_max_latency
> + # echo 1 > /debug/tracing/tracing_enabled
> + # ls -ltr
> + [...]
> + # echo 0 > /debug/tracing/tracing_enabled
> + # cat /debug/tracing/latency_trace
> +# tracer: preemptirqsoff
[...]
> +This is a very interesting trace. It started with the preemption of
> +the ls task. We see that the task had the "need_resched" bit set
> +with the 'N' in the trace. Interrupts are disabled in the spin_lock
> +and the trace started. We see that a schedule took place to run
> +sshd. When the interrupts were enabled we took an interrupt.
(comma)
> +On return of the interrupt the softirq ran. We took another interrupt
from the interrupt handler,
> +while running the softirq as we see with the capital 'H'.
> +
> +
> +wakeup
> +------
> +
> +In Real-Time environment it is very important to know the wakeup
> +time it takes for the highest priority task that wakes up to the
> +time it executes. This is also known as "schedule latency".
> +I stress the point that this is about RT tasks. It is also important
> +to know the scheduling latency of non-RT tasks, but the average
> +schedule latency is better for non-RT tasks. Tools like
> +LatencyTop is more appropriate for such measurements.
are
> +
> +Real-Time environments is interested in the worst case latency.
are
> +That is the longest latency it takes for something to happen, and
> +not the average. We can have a very fast scheduler that may only
> +have a large latency once in a while, but that would not work well
> +with Real-Time tasks. The wakeup tracer was designed to record
> +the worst case wakeups of RT tasks. Non-RT tasks are not recorded
> +because the tracer only records one worst case and tracing non-RT
> +tasks that are unpredictable will overwrite the worst case latency
> +of RT tasks.
> +
> +Since this tracer only deals with RT tasks, we will run this slightly
> +different than we did with the previous tracers. Instead of performing
> +an 'ls' we will run 'sleep 1' under 'chrt' which changes the
(comma)
> +priority of the task.
[...]
> +Running this on an idle system we see that it only took 4 microseconds
(comma)
> +to perform the task switch. Note, since the trace marker in the
> +schedule is before the actual "switch" we stop the tracing when
(comma)
> +the recorded task is about to schedule in. This may change if
> +we add a new marker at the end of the scheduler.
[...]
> +Where as the setting of the NEED_RESCHED bit happens on the
> +task's stack. But because we are in a hard interrupt, the test
> +is with the interrupts stack which has that to be false. We don't
^^^^
Superfluous that? Don't understand that sentence.
> +see the 'N' until we switch back to the task's stack.
[...]
> +When dynamic ftrace is initialized, it calls kstop_machine to make it
> +act like a uniprocessor so that it can freely modify code without
> +worrying about other processors executing that same code. At
> +initialization, the mcount calls are change to call a "record_ip"
changed
> +function. After this, the first time a kernel function is called,
> +it has the calling address saved in a hash table.
[...]
> +Two files that contain to the enabling and disabling of recorded
> +functions are:
Can this be expressed somewhat differently?
> +
> + set_ftrace_filter
> +
> +and
> +
> + set_ftrace_notrace
> +
> +A list of available functions that you can add to this files is listed
these
> +in:
> +
> + available_filter_functions
[...]
> +Perhaps this isn't enough. The filters also allow simple wild cards.
> +Only the following is currently available
> +
> + <match>* - will match functions that begins with <match>
begin
> + *<match> - will match functions that end with <match>
> + *<match>* - will match functions that have <match> in it
[...]
> +This is because the '>' and '>>' act just like they do in bash.
> +To rewrite the filters, use '>'
> +To append to the filters, use '>>'
> +
> +To clear out a filter so that all functions will be recorded again.
:
> +
> + # echo > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
> + # cat /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
> + #
[...]
> +ftraced
> +-------
> +
> +As mentioned above, when dynamic ftrace is configured in, a kernel
> +thread wakes up once a second and checks to see if there are mcount
> +calls that need to be converted into nops. If there is not, then
are
> +it simply goes back to sleep. But if there is, it will call
are
> +kstop_machine to convert the calls to nops.
[...]
> +Any write to the ftraced_enabled file will cause the kstop_machine
> +to run if there are recorded calls to mcount. This means that a
Incomplete sentence.
> +user can manually perform the updates when they want to by simply
(s)he wants
> +echoing a '0' into the ftraced_enabled file.
[...]
> +Having too much or not enough data can be troublesome in diagnosing
> +some issue in the kernel. The file trace_entries is used to modify
> +the size of the internal trace buffers. The numbers listed
> +is the number of entries that can be recorded per CPU. To know
are
> +the full size, multiply the number of possible CPUS with the
> +number of entries.
> +
> + # cat /debug/tracing/trace_entries
> +65620
> +
> +Note, to modify this you must have tracing fulling disabled. To do that,
(comma) fully / completely
> +echo "none" into the current_tracer.
[...]
> +The number of pages that will be allocated is a percentage of available
> +memory. Allocating too much will produces an error.
produce
Regards,
Elias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/