Re: next-0710: CONFIG_PARAVIRT broken on x86_64?
From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Fri Jul 11 2008 - 07:15:38 EST
At Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:12:07 -0700,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Native. Booted on a HP machine with two Intel x86-64 CPUs.
> >
>
> Is that the complete log of what it prints out? Does it print any
> addresses or anything?
>
> Could you try tip.git with the config to see if its there? I don't
> think there should be anything relevent in -next, but there could be a
> merge problem or something.
Almost same result. The init segfaults at the very beginning.
The below is the whole screen output I could copy by hand (may include
some types).
> Does booting with "init=/bin/sh" make any progress?
No change.
thanks!
Takashi
===
registered taskstats version 1
Freeing unused kernel memory: 1220k freed
init [1]: segfault at ffffffffffffffa8 ip 00007fe939b9235c sp 00007fff42971028 error 6 in libc-2.8.so[7fe939abe000+14f000]
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempt to kill init!
Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.26-rc9-tip-test2 #2
Call trace:
[<ffffffff80252c7f>] ? blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xf/0x11
[<ffffffff8023f9f9>] ? do_exit+0x78/0x6de
[<ffffffff8024705f>] ? __dequeue_signal+0x114/0x177
[<ffffffff802400dc>] ? do_group_exit+-x7d/0xaa
[<ffffffff80248ce0>] ? get_signal_to_deliver+0x2fe/0x326
[<ffffffff8020b3fa>] ? do_notify_resume+0xbf/0x8f4
[<ffffffff8039029d>] ? sock_destroy_inode+0x14/0x16
[<ffffffff802b6491>] ? iput+0x61/0x65
[<ffffffff802b6491>] ? iput+0x61/0x65
[<ffffffff803915b4>] ? sock_release+0x66/0x76
[<ffffffff80391780>] ? __sock_create+0x180/0x19f
[<ffffffff8020c964>] ? retint_signal+0x60/0xbc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/