Re: [Bug 11063][PATCH] exec: fix stack excutability without PT_GNU_STACK

[Hugh Dickins]

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, pageexec@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 10 Jul 2008 at 21:19, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> > Therefore re-evaluate VM_STACK_FLAGS in setup_arg_pages, where stack
> > vm_flags used to be set, before the mprotect_fixup.  Checking through
> > our existing VM_flags, none would have changed since insert_vm_struct:
> > so this seems safer than finding a way through the personality labyrinth.
> 
> alternatively, if there's a concern of stack_vma->vm_flags manipulation
> during execve (maybe not now, but in the future or in non-ELF formats
> that also want to rely on personality bits), you could opt for a safer
> 
> 	vm_flags = vma->vm_flags | (VM_STACK_FLAGS & (VM_EXEC | VM_MAYEXEC));
> 
> to just recompute the exec rights related bits.

True.  It was a concern that crossed my mind (I was thinking particularly
of the VM_ACCOUNT flag, which gets added in once we deal with a writable
private mapping, but is set from the start here anyway), but I don't
think it's worth changing my

> > -	vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;
> > +	vm_flags = VM_STACK_FLAGS;

now that's already there in Linus' tree.  If a VM_flag gets added that
changes the picture, it might even need your line above to be changed.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/