Re: [git pull] core/softirq for v2.6.27
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Jul 14 2008 - 12:44:50 EST
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:31:41 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:42:43 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > It would be nice if these short-form summaries were to include the
> > commit IDs. eg:
> >
> > Carlos R. Mafra (1):
> > Remove argument from open_softirq which is always NULL (962cf36)
>
> yeah, but not sure whether git-shortlog
This was a git-shortlog feature request ;)
> can do that and this shortlog is
> the Preferred Way of getting pull requests.
>
> I'm using the sha1's myself for non-shortlog formats, like:
>
> earth4:~/tip> git-log-line linus..core/softirq
> 0f476b6: softirq: remove irqs_disabled warning from local_bh_enable
> 4620b49: softirq: remove initialization of static per-cpu variable
> 962cf36: Remove argument from open_softirq which is always NULL
>
> where git-log-line does the obvious single-line shortcut:
>
> git log --no-merges --pretty=format:"%h: %s" $@
>
> > > Carlos R. Mafra (1):
> > > Remove argument from open_softirq which is always NULL
> > >
> > > Johannes Berg (1):
> > > softirq: remove irqs_disabled warning from local_bh_enable
> >
> > This doesn't remove the warning? (Nor should it)
> >
> > +static inline void _local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip)
> > {
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() || irqs_disabled());
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled());
> >
> > It just makes it a bit less useful.
>
> hm, it does more than that
Yes, but it does what I said:
- Doesn't do something which the changelog said it did. I brought this up
because if the patch _did_ do what it said it did, davem would cry.
- Makes the warning less useful. The reason for the warning can still
probably be worked out from the backtrace, but it'll take more work.
> - this commit (0f476b6d9) actually caught a
> real bug/lockup on one of my testboxes, see this (in v2.6.26) fix:
>
> | commit c5643cab7bf663ae049b11be43de8819683176dd
> | Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> | Date: Mon Jun 23 10:41:23 2008 +0200
> |
> | [netdrvr] 3c59x: remove irqs_disabled warning from local_bh_enable
OK, that title kinda makes sense.
> | Original Author: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx>
> |
> | net, vortex: fix lockup
Although that would be a better title for the 3c59x.c fix.
> [ i didnt send it to v2.6.26 because it came relatively late, it touches
> a sensitive, #ifdef laden piece of code and it was unknown how many
> false positives it would trigger. But it's perfect for v2.6.27. ]
>
It's a small issue - it's just that the title of
0f476b6d91a1395bda6464e653ce66ea9bea7167 ("softirq: remove
irqs_disabled warning from local_bh_enable") appears to be quite
wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/