Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Jul 15 2008 - 11:20:28 EST
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Or you could just do it like emacs or Solaris and simply use a single number.
No, that would be horrible. The only point of changign the numbering would
be to make the numbers smaller. Not fewer. I don't like "26" much as a
version number, I'd like "131" even less.
So I'd much rather have something like "2.9.1" than "27", just because
it's a hierarchy of simpler numbers.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/