Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel,use it in more drivers.

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> David W has made it very clear that the eventual intent of this patch series
> is to remove all firmware from the kernel tree and have it shipped as a
> seperate package.

I don't think that kind of black-and-white model is necessarily 
attainable. Nor do I think it's even _good_.

It's probably the right thign for _some_ firmware, assuming we have models 
that just make it easy enough - for drivers where it's generally better 
for distros to get the firmware from vendors rather than the kernel.

But there is certainly nothing inherently good in forcing a split.

I think both sides here need to calm down and stop being so extreme.

I do want request_firmware() to be the way to load firmware (and possibly 
other configuration data too, for that matter - I don't think it's 
necessarily wrong for people to "misuse" it for other long-term data 
despite the name), and I do want people to be able to update firmware 
easily without having to force a kernel bump, but I also don't think it 
means that firmware has to go away from the kernel sources.

So I think the _infrastructure_ is important. But the extreme "you have to 
split it off entirely" mindset is equally as stupid as the "you must 
compile it into the module" mindset.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/