Re: [patch 01/15] Kernel Tracepoints

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> I'm also wondering if it's better to have :
>
> filemap.h
> fs.h
> hugetlb.h
> ipc.h
> ipv4.h
> ipv6.h
> irq.h
> kernel.h
> memory.h
> net.h
> page.h
> sched.h
> swap.h
> timer.h

This might be a better idea.

>
> all in include/trace/ or to create subdirectories first, like :
>
> include/trace/net/
> include/trace/mm/

I think that is too much. A single trace directory should be sufficent.

> ....
>
> or to go the other way around and re-use the existing subdirectories :
>
> include/net/trace/
> include/mm/trace/
> ....

I'm definitely against that.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/