Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000000e (reset_prng_context)
From: Herbert Xu
Date: Wed Jul 16 2008 - 01:35:53 EST
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:51:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> And I agree with me. I fail to see how someone who is familiar with
> kernel code and who is reviewing a submission could let something like
>
> for (i=DEFAULT_BLK_SZ-1;i>0;i--) {
>
> pass without comment.
Well here is the code in question in its entirety:
/*
* Now update our DT value
*/
for (i=DEFAULT_BLK_SZ-1;i>0;i--) {
ctx->DT[i] = ctx->DT[i-1];
}
I'm afraid that I simply don't see your point.
> btw, I've searched my linux-kernel archives and netdev archives and the
> linux-crypto web archives and can find no sign of any submission or
> discussion of this patch. Am I looking in the wrong places?
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg02082.html
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/